RocRail also has apps for Android and IOS. RocRail should however be better at LocoIO programming than JMRI. I am assuming that is only while programming decoders. It is being critisized for not supporting very many decoder types. RocRail seems to be more of an effort to make a true competitor to the commercial model railroad control software products. And it means a lot of layers of library code, before getting down to the hardware, such as PC sound, USB ports, harddisk etc. It does hoever not make anything faster – especially not start-up of the software. That is in principle a good choice ensuring that it runs on many operating systems. I will have to deal with the rest using Uhlenbrocks somewhat basic software. But there is supposed to be a LocoIO programmer in JMRI. How things are with Loconet programming is until further unknown to me. And that seems odd, since decoder programming is supposed to be one of the things that JMRI is really good at. I have had to patch it to make feedback as well as switch control working.Īnd DCC decoder programming is not working at all via IB-COM. The big downside to JMRI seems to be that the IB-COM interface doesn’t seem to work. I cannot see what the big difference between the two versions is, but I suspect I am going to find out, if I start using the light edition. The iPad version has a free light edition, whereas the full version costs 65 DKK. JMRI has a free throttle app for Android. There is also a thing as interesting as a sound generator for locomotive sounds, so that locomotives without their own sound decoder can ge sounds anyway. JMRI seems to be a big library of basic software (programmed in Java) with interface to a lot of different command-stations, a lot of decoder definitions, some decoder programming capabilities, built-in scripting capabilities as well as some more or less unfinished applications for layout visualization, automatic dispatching of trains etc. There seems to be two serious candidates: JMRI that I have already been looking at and RocRail that I have also installed on my PC and has seen “hole through” in. And Windigipet seems to be another serious candidate.įree software (Open Source Software, OSS) seems to be the way to go for me. It costs between 100 and 500 Euro depending on version. I have heard about a program called RR&Co. And it would make me even poorer than I am already. ![]() Even the smallest bug in the program would be impossible. The down-side would be that there will be no chances to write additional modules myself and not even to tweak the existing functionality. And I would expect easy-to-use and well-working software. But the price will be that it will take several years before I know enough details about all protocols, such as the Uhlenbrock PC interface, DCC and Loconet and before I have utilized such knowledge to actually write the software for both implementing these communication protocols as well as the application code to visualize my layout and the control code to actually run trains., switches etc.īy buying commercial software, I would expect to get going very fast. If I am writing it all from scratch, I will have full control about all details. Hopefully folks with more knowledge of both of these can add to (or correct) my assessment.My layout shall be PC controlled. ![]() ![]() RailRoad and Company is a software package that has a large following as well, but it's not free. So based on my limited understanding of RocRail, I would say JMRI would have more functionality, but RocRail looks to be more suited to automated running. RocRail is more European-centric in it's implementation, while JMRI is North America based (although it has been applied to other countries operations as well.). I have only scratched the surface of JMRI's capabilities, so I'm sure it can do much more. PanelPro allows virtual control panels to be built and supports a variety of signalling schemes through Logix and SSL (Simple Signal Logic). JMRI's DecoderPro application provides for easy programming of mobile and stationary decoders. I had not seen RocRail before, but after looking at some of the basic info, it seems to be a fairly comprehensive application for automated train operation based on a client-server model.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |